The content was interesting and the instructor was very knowledgeable but I found the content very repetitive, the videos were too long and I thought that a lot of the concepts could have been explained in shorter videos or in a shorter course overall.

Course was good, but the assessment was very basic, it was all just demonstrating prompts, and all worth 1 mark so no indication of if it was good or just barely triggered what the AI was looking for.

There are some really good prompts in this course but not every prompt. some of the topics are irrelevant and not being actually used in day-to-day work. 50 percent of the prompt was usefull

This course is incredibly fascinating. I learn a lot of magnificent things. But one thing that I face, the links given in the reading material are not working. Please check those links.

The course is not relevant in 2025, many of the topics are updated and the newest version of ChatGPT is already resolving some of the issues outlined

The content is great, however rather lengthy presentation. would be great if the readings could be downloaded in a summarised way

Die Aufgaben/Übungen waren nicht immer eindeutig und auch die Übersetzung ins Deutsche war teilweise fehlerhaft.

Too long. I would go straight to the point. It would be good a summary cheat-sheet at the end of the course.

It was decent, but could have been half the length of time. Too verbose

Some of the content is outdated now as the tech has changed rapidly.

The lesson explanation was long and boring.

Excellent course, I highly recommend it

Can be kept more examples and topics

I felt the videos were too long.

A bit too basic, and outdated-

GOOOD COUSE

helpfull

helpful

Usually Dr. Jule's courses are very educational. However there was too much information in one course. I would suggest this one course be divided into two courses with more opportunities to use these new prompts. It was very complicated and too much information o learn at once

Wow. Disappointing. A niche use case as a "motivating" example by someone who "didn't see this coming" which would indicate a lack of intimate knowledge of the space. Not a thought leader I would invest valuable resources on. Moving on with said resources. ie time and coin

Over 1.5 years old in 3.5. It is not helpful for me. There should have been more research done for the curriculum design. Prompts have changed and AI far smarter.

Prompt Eng was a great class, but this adv data analytics is too confusing. Do I have to pay to get on GTP-4??? How do I access the free version

it is less relevant now there is 4.0 available

unnecessarily wordy

ok ok